Lorman offers professional resources regarding COVID-19 and remote working best practices.  Learn more

Show navigation

State E-Verify and I-9 Laws - 2010 Updates

» Articles » Employment & Labor Articles » Article

February 15, 2010

E-Verify, the Internet-based system operated by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) that allows employers to verify the employment eligibility of employees, remains voluntary at the federal level with the exception of certain federal contractors. However, certain states have acted to require some or all employers to use the system. Arizona has the most sweeping law, requiring all employers to use E-Verify. While Colorado requires only certain government contractors to use E-Verify, all Colorado employers must retain a special Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification affirmation and copies of the documents presented during the I-9 process (see the Colorado Department of Labor & Employment website for more information).

The Illinois Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act places statutory obligations on employers within the state that use E-Verify. Effective January 1, 2010, employers must complete an attestation at the time of E-Verify enrollment (or by January 30, 2010, if already enrolled) confirming that responsible employees have completed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) E-Verify tutorial. Employers also must attest that they have posted applicable E-Verify and Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) notices at the workplace. Consistent with the DHS’ Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) entered into by E-Verify participants, employers are prohibited from terminating employees prior to receiving a final nonconfirmation of employment authorization from E-Verify and from using E-Verify to pre-screen employment applicants. However, the Illinois law allows injured employees to file a claim against the employer pursuant to the Illinois Human Rights Act. Visit the Illinois Department of Labor website or the January 11 issue of the Illinois eAuthority for more information on the law.

South Carolina continues to phase in an employment verification law for employers within the state. The South Carolina Illegal Immigration Reform Act requires employers to either use E-Verify or review a qualifying driver’s license. As of January 1, 2010, all public contractors and private employers with 100 or more employees are subject to the law. On July 1, 2010, remaining employers (private employers with less than 100 employees) will also need to meet the E-Verify or driver’s license requirement.

The Mississippi Employment Protection Act (S.B. 2988) phases in a requirement on employers to participate in E-Verify. On July 1, 2008, all Mississippi agencies and political subdivisions, all public contractors, and private employers with 250 or more employees became subject to the E-Verify requirement. On July 1, 2009, private employers with 100 or more employees also became subject to the requirement. By July 1, 2011, all Mississippi employers will be required to use E-Verify.

Continue reading below

FREE Employment & Labor Training from Lorman

Lorman has over 33 years of professional training experience.
Join us for a special report and level up your Employment & Labor knowledge!

Employee Discipline and Termination
Presented by Crystal L. Norbeck

Learn More

The states noted above have the most far-reaching laws affecting I-9 employment verification and E-Verify. Several other states purport to require E-Verify of public employers and/or government contractors, including Georgia, Minnesota and Missouri. In the absence of a comprehensive federal system, employers are thus forced to track the various requirements concerning I-9 and E-Verify at both the federal and state levels.  

Note: This article was published in the January 2010 issue of the Immigration eAuthority.

The material appearing in this web site is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The information provided herein is intended only as general information which may or may not reflect the most current developments. Although these materials may be prepared by professionals, they should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.

The opinions or viewpoints expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Lorman Education Services. All materials and content were prepared by persons and/or entities other than Lorman Education Services, and said other persons and/or entities are solely responsible for their content.

Any links to other web sites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of these sites. The links provided are maintained by the respective organizations, and they are solely responsible for the content of their own sites.