The Importance of Proper Documentation Procedures

» Articles » Construction Articles » Article

January 08, 2014


I have an 8-year-old son with quite an imagination who excels at active play. One of his loves (when he does slow down) is watching a Star Wars movie. He knows every character, planet, movie scene and, of course, weapon type. He has light sabers of the various characters, a Darth Vader costume and all the movies. I rarely watch a movie of any kind; however, because of my son, I have managed to see all of the six Star Wars movies over the course of the past couple of years — in 10-minute increments. One thing that strikes me is how the presence of a sith (a really evil guy who wants to destroy good) causes an imbalance in the force and threatens good throughout the galaxy. The entire universe gets turned upside down, physically and psychologically. Equally as striking are the efforts that the good guys, the Jedi, take to try to eliminate a sith.

It reminds me of issues that lead to claims on construction projects. The word “claim” on a construction project is like the word “sith” in the universe of Star Wars. One thing is certain: like a sith, issues on construction projects will come and they can turn a project upside down both physically and emotionally. A question I would ask is: “How are you preparing to react when it looks like a sith is coming to your project?”. Fortunately, there are actions you can take at the onset to protect yourself.

This article focuses on the importance of documentation and practical practices that will help you when a claim is coming into your universe.

Later in the article, I will review some pointers for making project documents more effective. Before that, we need to discuss the importance of proper documentation procedures. Just in case you need convincing, keep in mind that if a dispute goes all the way to litigation, every scrap of paper from the project will likely be read. Regardless of whether you’re a contractor, owner or engineer, you want to know that you’ve put the right things down on paper to present the factual events of the project during any dispute resolution process.

Continue reading below

FREE Construction Training from Lorman

Lorman has over 37 years of professional training experience.
Join us for a special white paper and level up your Construction knowledge!

Best Practices for Measuring and Documenting Construction Delays

Learn More

Good documentation just doesn’t happen by accident. Left to our own devices, many of us probably think we have better things to do than write down what the weather was that day, fill out the shop drawing log or, dare I say, update the schedule. After all, there’s a project to build. However, it only takes one time in litigation to change that mindset. In addition, the reality of a dispute resolution forum is that who’s right and who’s wrong may not determine who wins the case. It can come down to who can present the best documents to support their case.

Documentation at Every Project Level

Here’s a typical claim scenario: An issue arises on a project. A couple of meetings take place and the positions are laid out. Resolution doesn’t occur and tempers may flare. So what happens next? Usually, a letter-writing campaign ensues. The engineer and the contractor start carefully crafting correspondence. Every word is painstakingly reviewed. It turns into a he said/he said situation. Sometimes, the letters are even reviewed by counsel (a good idea, by the way, if the stakes are high and relations strained). Well-crafted letters are a vital part of the project record, especially during ligation. However, consider for a moment the project participants who wrote them and for what purpose. Then ask, will claims notice and response letters be taken as sole source gospel or as an accurate portrayal of the events of the project, or will they be viewed as each side posturing in anticipation of litigation.

Remember that in litigation, every document could be read. That means not only the letters, but the meeting minutes, foreman’s reports, inspection reports, shop drawing logs and, of course, the emails. A review of meeting minutes, emails and daily reports prior to disputes reveals how the parties were interacting with each other before tensions rose. Regular project documentation, such as meeting minutes and daily reports also generally contain the thoughts and mental impressions of the parties as they were coming to their minds. The thoughts of the inspection staff and foremen in the field may play just as important a role in a dispute as the carefully crafted letters. Because of this, every form of project documentation, from high-level letters to daily reports, should be drafted professionally. Therefore, it is vital that every project participant be trained to create factually correct and professional documentation.

Good Documentation Practices

Obviously, this topic is not rocket science. However, if you ever get into litigation, you will understand its importance. So, here are some practical things to consider to improve your documentation.

In my career, I’ve read thousands of daily reports, meeting minutes and letters. I’ve got to admit, some of them have been pretty comical. I’ve seen some pretty creative analogies and insults hurled. These types of documents may be fun to read, and may even make the authors feel better because they’ve gotten something off their mind. However, remember, every project document may be read by someone. It’s important that project documentation provide facts and not opinions or observations about someone’s mother.

Think of the old cliché, “timing is everything.” It’s true in the case of project documentation. It’s important that project participants be timely with all forms of correspondence. Read the contract and abide by what it says regarding issuance of meeting minutes, RFIs, shop drawing reviews, notice of claims and associated responses.

For some reason, people will put something in an email that they would never say to someone’s face or put in a letter. The truth is that you should be just as careful with what you say in email as you would in any other type of documentation. Email is just as admissible as any other form of documentation. Email also has this weird way of showing up in the strangest places. The landscape of litigation and electronic document discovery is constantly changing. I’m not going to cover it here, but it’s important to know the latest rules and make sure that your firm is up to date.

Here’s one more tip that may sound simple: Understand what you get. Let’s face it, we all can’t know everything. Construction projects can be complicated. Disputed issues usually are. I’ve seen plenty of cases where complicated CPM schedules were submitted by a contractor and the owner did not review and comment simply because there was no understanding of what was submitted. This obviously creates all kinds of problems during the project and all the way through litigation. I encourage you to seek an explanation if you don’t understand or don’t have time to review the correspondence.

 

Conclusion

Hopefully, I’ve provided you with a taste of the importance of good documentation. The good thing about what we’ve explored is that documentation practices are relatively easy to improve. I would encourage you to improve your own documentation practices in one or more of the areas we explored in this article. If that doesn’t work, I can always send my son over with a light saber the next time you’re faced with pending litigation.

About the Author

Roy J. Cooper, P.E. is Associate Vice President for PinnacleOne and leads the Construction Claims Services in the eastern United States. Mr. Cooper’s 20 years of construction experience includes consulting to sureties dealing with troubled projects and the analysis and review of complex construction claims from the beginning stages through trial support and expert testimony. He has also been a successful project superintendent and engineer on high profile projects where he was responsible for all aspects of construction. In addition to his practical hands-on knowledge of construction principles and management and how they related to distressed projects, Mr. Cooper has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Michigan Technological University and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Connecticut.

About the Publisher

Lorman Education Services is a leading provider of continuing education including educational topics for the Construction and Develoment industry. Visit www.lorman.com today for all or construction training and education needs.


The material appearing in this web site is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The information provided herein is intended only as general information which may or may not reflect the most current developments. Although these materials may be prepared by professionals, they should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.

The opinions or viewpoints expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Lorman Education Services. All materials and content were prepared by persons and/or entities other than Lorman Education Services, and said other persons and/or entities are solely responsible for their content.

Any links to other web sites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of these sites. The links provided are maintained by the respective organizations, and they are solely responsible for the content of their own sites.